Are small funds losing ground?

PB icon
Content hub / Article / PitchBook / Are small funds losing ground?

Download PitchBook’s report here.

Another quarter, another round of outperformance for large funds. Rolling one-year horizon IRRs have been consistent of late when broken down by fund size, and $1B+ PE funds once again bested their smaller peers in recent returns. Much of that recent outperformance might be traced back to mark-to-market gains, which have helped boost private market comparables. Larger funds tend to hold larger portfolio companies that are more closely related in size to public companies. Those fund managers are then able to more aggressively mark up their current portfolios in tandem with the rise in public equities. On the other hand, smaller funds with less than $250M have lagged their peers. Since 2010, sub-$250M funds have outperformed the other three size buckets in only four quarters, and all consecutively between 2Q 2012 and 1Q 2013. Their recent streak is less compelling, underperforming all other size buckets for 12 straight quarters (and counting).

How far should we look into this? Perhaps not too far—deciphering trends in PE fund performance can be like nailing jello to the wall. Even general findings of persistence require caveats and asterisks. This particular study is of shorter-term, rolling returns and is not representative of the life of the fund. Other academic studies have found outperformance from smaller funds against their larger counterparts. Wherever the truth lies, recent performance impacts perception, especially when LPs re-up their commitments. The fact that larger funds are currently outperforming their peers only adds to the pile of reasons for the recent success of large fundraises and the relative difficulty of smaller fundraises. LPs continue to consolidate the number of relationships they manage with private equity GPs. That favors larger funds, which are happy to take in larger dollops of capital as a result. A 2017 survey by Palico underscored the trend, finding almost half (47%) of surveyed LPs were willing to “target lower performance if an opportunity permits an exceptionally large investment.” Time will tell if that’s a wise tradeoff, but at least some slices of data suggest there isn’t much of a tradeoff at the moment.

Contact Alex Lykken
Making sense of private credit defaults

Webinar

Making sense of private credit defaults

What does private credit default data really tell us? Join our exclusive webinar featuring experts from KBRA, Moody's, Fitch Ratings, and S&P Global to find out.
Register
Credit Journal-Private Credit

Report

Credit Journal-Private Credit

Fitch Ratings’ latest Credit Journal series is a subject-specific, curated compilation of in-depth research and commentary. This edition explores the growing world of private credit, including non-bank lending across business development companies.
Download
PitchBook's US PE Middle Market Report

Report

PitchBook's US PE Middle Market Report

The middle market is off to its best start to a year since 2021, but its share of PE keeps slipping.
Download
Private Debt Investor New York Forum

September 15-16, Hudson Yards, New York

Private Debt Investor New York Forum

Bringing together the investors, managers and advisers shaping the next phase of the market — 200+ allocators and $10.6 trillion of LP capital expected. Benchmark strategies, hear from leading LPs, and cut through market noise over two unmissable days.
Learn more

Latest news

    PE middle-market pooled IRR and TVPI by TEV size bucket

    The lower end of the middle market has generated better returns on average and does not come with significantly more left-tail risk

    Read More

    Accordion inside maturity

    Read More

    Investors exit retail loan funds in July

    Investors in leveraged loans have been pulling money from retail funds in recent weeks, with redemptions outpacing investments by $253.3b…

    Read More