Quantifying style drift

PB icon
Content hub / Article / PitchBook / Quantifying style drift

An upcoming PitchBook analyst note takes a look at GP style drift. It’s an important topic but a frustrating one for LPs. Quantifying the drift is tricky. Our framework assigns style scores to the PE firms themselves over time, instead of at the fund level. We broke the style definitions into three broad categories—generalists, specialists, and “targeted”, which is something of a middle-ground between the two extremes. The time element is staggered, with overlapping ten-year buckets that show the gradual drifts over time.

In the chart above, the obvious trend is a shift away from the generalist category and a growing representation for specialists. Between 2000 and 2010, generalists accounted for 34.1% of the PE universe compared to only 25.9% for the 2010-2020 vintage bucket. The opposite happened for specialists, which now account for 37.3% of all PE firms compared to 25.1% a decade earlier. The “targeted” category doesn’t shift very much in percentage terms, but that’s actually where most of the action happens. Generalists can become narrower over time while specialists can expand their focuses as they grow. Both would eventually wind up in the same middle category.

All of this is important for LPs, who are concerned about the trend. More specialization is a positive overall, but as LPs have become more sophisticated, so have their allocation models. A hypothetical LP might target a 10% allocation to consumer-focused funds and another 10% to software focused ones. GPs that decide to go in different directions, however slight, can cause a ripple effect across dozens of LP portfolios. There’s also the concern that they’ll be able to pull off the transition. Second basemen and third basemen are both infielders but require slightly different skillsets to do their jobs well. By definition, LPs have limited control over internal decision-making at the GP level; they can’t be team manager and require their players to stay in one spot. The hope is that the transition works out well and returns don’t suffer. They may need to find another second basemen to get their allocations intact again, too.

Contact: Alex Lykken
alex.lykken@pitchbook.com

Contact Alex Lykken
Making sense of private credit defaults

Webinar

Making sense of private credit defaults

What does private credit default data really tell us? Join our exclusive webinar featuring experts from KBRA, Moody's, Fitch Ratings, and S&P Global to find out.
Register
US Private Credit League Tables H1'26

Report

US Private Credit League Tables H1'26

The definitive rankings covering private credit activity in H1'26.
Download
PitchBook's US PE Middle Market Report

Report

PitchBook's US PE Middle Market Report

The middle market is off to its best start to a year since 2021, but its share of PE keeps slipping.
Download
Private Debt Investor New York Forum

September 15-16, Hudson Yards, New York

Private Debt Investor New York Forum

Bringing together the investors, managers and advisers shaping the next phase of the market — 200+ allocators and $10.6 trillion of LP capital expected. Benchmark strategies, hear from leading LPs, and cut through market noise over two unmissable days.
Learn more
Credit Journal-Private Credit

Report

Credit Journal-Private Credit

Fitch Ratings’ latest Credit Journal series is a subject-specific, curated compilation of in-depth research and commentary. This edition explores the growing world of private credit, including non-bank lending across business development companies.
Download

Latest news

    US Leveraged Loan Issuance Slows to $76.5b in July

    The US leveraged loan market has continued to slow from the May level of $104.7b, with approximately $76.5b priced in…

    Read More

    KBRA DLD Default Indices

    Read More

    Post-Workout Recovery

    The more you train, the better the recovery.

    Read More